Friday, July 1, 2016

Mindfulness

     We have begun exploring the topic of avodas hamiddos. This week, we will discuss an essential and fundamental idea, pertaining to all avoda; mindfulness. It may be little known, but avoda requires a great deal of "mind" work, besides for all the emotional exertion necessary. While the concept of mindfulness is the basis for various forms of therapy and meditation, we'll use the term in its' broadest sense. Simply put, instead of going through our routine mindlessly, we should be in a constant state of awareness of our thoughts and actions. This is possibly the most basic element necessary to advance in our avoda.
 
      There are people who are "in touch" with themselves, and there are people who "know" themselves. There is a vast semantical difference between the two. Being "in touch" is the equivalent of a casual friendship. You maintain contact, but it's cursory. People who "know" themselves are deeply interested in learning every facet about themselves, even the minor details.  
 
      People who are "in touch" with themselves track their actions. People who "know" themselves track their thoughts. Thoughts come in two forms; conscious and subconscious. Rav Issac Sher writes in his introduction to the Cheshbon Hanefesh, that conscious thoughts are the result of subconscious thoughts. We have a constant "thought flow" in our minds that we may not even be cognizant of. These "thoughts" are the direct result of "middos". Middos, he explains, are "inner feelings of the soul", and they are expressed in subconscious thoughts. These thoughts are the primary influence on conscious thought. Conscious thought may be intellectual, but subconscious thought, by definition is not. When we find ourselves having thoughts and we don't know where they come from, they're rooted in middos. Therefore, we must pay attention, not only to our actions but to our thoughts as well.          
   
      Rav Nosson Zvi Finkel, the Alter of Slabodka told a story which illustrates this idea. A rumor reached the authorities, that the administration of the Beys Hatalmud in Kelm was inciteful against the government. When the  police converged on the Yeshiva to arrest the Alter of Kelm, R' Nosson Zvi announced that he was the rosh yeshiva, to spare his rebbe.  Later, when he related the incident, he added, that perhaps, in addition to his desire to save his rebbe, he also wanted to brag to the officials that he was in fact the head of the yeshiva.
   
     Similarly, someone deliberating about whether to begin a new gemach must ask himself why. He may think it's because he wants to "be mezake the rabbim" or some other selfless reason. However, if he would dig deeper, he may find that he has ulterior motives, like enjoying people's dependence on him or being called a big ba'al chesed. He should think back to his very first subconscious thought which will determine what his true motives are. The first thoughts are the middos speaking; the real him. After that, they're all fake; they may be good "cheshbonos", but they aren't "his" cheshbonos.
   
     Actions are merely external. Sometimes, we do things without reason. We react. We don't think through the results of our actions, and certainly not our motives. Middos are the cause of our subconscious thoughts. If we pay attention to our subconscious, we will succeed in finding the real "I" within ourselves.



     

5 comments:

  1. excellently thought out and presented. Very important to be spoken about and refreshing to hear.
    in practicality I find some difficulty with the idea of knowing one's true motivation. I agree with what you say: The first thoughts are the middos speakingף but practically speaking it is not simple at all to track, to descend to 'first thoughts' because truly our first thougths started when we were born, and in a deeper sense, even in previous gilgulim. So to truly understand one's true motivation is certainly not pashut. Therefore practically speaking, it seems that one is forced to work with much "shelo l'slshma", that is: cheshbonot. That is, even if one's motives may not be pure, this doesn't mean he shouldn't start the gemach. I suppose that what I am saying is that one's search to know oneself perhaps is still subserviant to doing good deeds. אפשר לומר שהוא בכלל: לא המדרש הוא העיקר אלא המעשה. Part of knowing oneself is knowing when and how to act even though he doesn't understand. לענ"ד

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for your thoughts. Regarding the difficulty of tracking first thoughts, i want to clarify that, I'm not referring to remembering them-that would be b'diavad...l'chatchila, one should be aware of the thoughts as they come...
      (As far as gilgulim go, I'm not certain that the "mussar approach" necessarily concerns itself with that...)
      I agree that in many cases it would be subservient, especially (and obviously) in cases of clear-cut halacha. However, I do think that there may be times when not. For example, chumros, or hanhagos al pi kaballa... Even in the case of the gemach, perhaps, if it's to manipulate others to some degree, it may be better to refrain...

      Delete
    2. If previous gilgulim are not considered, remains a very incomplete picture of the Jew, and the goal is to serve Hashem b'emes, and to fulfill our true purpose. One must understand the path of his neshama; otherwise, Heaven forbid, our efforts can become some kind of Torah-based behavioral pschology, which, albeit, can be very benificial for creating a well-adjusted person, and even correct character faults, and acheive very much good...but the ikar of the Jew is the neshama...

      Delete
  2. To add (to your very well worded article): The Ba'al HaTanya illustrates that in the same way our blood fills our veins, our emotions fill our actions, and that the analogy goes one step higher with our subconscious assumptions dictating our emotions. In light of this, advancing one's Avodah beings with discovering predisposed Hashkafos, and addressing them. From there, the effect will spill over until even concrete actions change.

    ReplyDelete